mirror of https://github.com/CGAL/cgal
changes after Andreas' comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
9abd087b72
commit
1cfd259f99
|
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ namespace CGAL {
|
|||
\anchor chapterHTriangulation2
|
||||
|
||||
\cgalAutoToc
|
||||
\author Mikhail Bogdanov, and Iordan Iordanov, and Monique Teillaud
|
||||
\author Mikhail Bogdanov, Iordan Iordanov, and Monique Teillaud
|
||||
|
||||
<center>
|
||||
<img src="header.png" style="max-width:60%; width=60%;"/>
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,22 +46,8 @@ As hyperbolic circles coincide with Euclidean circles contained in the
|
|||
unit disk, the combinatorial structure of the hyperbolic Delaunay
|
||||
triangulation of a set \f$\mathcal P\f$ of points in \f$\mathbb H^2\f$
|
||||
is a subset of the Euclidean Delaunay triangulation of \f$\mathcal
|
||||
P\f$. Of course, the hyperbolic and Euclidean geometric embeddings of a
|
||||
given Delaunay face are different. See
|
||||
\cgalFigureRef{Hyperbolic_triangulation_2Euclidean_vs_hyperbolic}.
|
||||
|
||||
\cgalFigureAnchor{Hyperbolic_triangulation_2Euclidean_vs_hyperbolic}
|
||||
<center>
|
||||
<img src="hyperbolic-vs-euclidean.png" style="max-width:35%; width=35%;"/>
|
||||
</center>
|
||||
\cgalFigureCaptionBegin{Hyperbolic_triangulation_2Euclidean_vs_hyperbolic}
|
||||
Comparison of the Euclidean (green) and hyperbolic (black) Delaunay triangulations
|
||||
of a given set of points in the unit disk. Note that only the colored faces
|
||||
are faces of the hyperbolic Delaunay triangulation.
|
||||
\cgalFigureCaptionEnd
|
||||
|
||||
More precisely, the hyperbolic Delaunay triangulation of \f$\mathcal
|
||||
P\f$ is a connected simplicial complex. It only
|
||||
P\f$. More precisely, the hyperbolic Delaunay triangulation of \f$\mathcal
|
||||
P\f$ is a connected simplicial complex that only
|
||||
contains the simplices of the Euclidean Delaunay triangulation that
|
||||
are <i>hyperbolic</i>:
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
|
|
@ -72,6 +58,20 @@ are <i>hyperbolic</i>:
|
|||
P\f$) passing through its endpoints is contained in \f$\mathbb
|
||||
H^2\f$.
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
See \cgalFigureRef{Hyperbolic_triangulation_2Euclidean_vs_hyperbolic}.
|
||||
|
||||
\cgalFigureAnchor{Hyperbolic_triangulation_2Euclidean_vs_hyperbolic}
|
||||
<center>
|
||||
<img src="hyperbolic-vs-euclidean.png" style="max-width:35%; width=35%;"/>
|
||||
</center>
|
||||
\cgalFigureCaptionBegin{Hyperbolic_triangulation_2Euclidean_vs_hyperbolic}
|
||||
Comparison of the Euclidean (green) and hyperbolic (black) Delaunay triangulations
|
||||
of a given set of points in the unit disk. Only the colored faces
|
||||
are faces of the hyperbolic Delaunay triangulation. The hyperbolic and Euclidean geometric embeddings of a
|
||||
Delaunay face that exists in both triangulations are different.
|
||||
\cgalFigureCaptionEnd
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
In the Euclidean Delaunay triangulation, there is a bijection between
|
||||
non-hyperbolic faces and non-hyperbolic edges
|
||||
\cgalCite{cgal:bdt-hdcvd-14}. See
|
||||
|
|
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ as no empty circle through its endpoints is contained in
|
|||
\section HT2_Software_design Software Design
|
||||
From what was said above, it is natural that the class
|
||||
`Hyperbolic_Delaunay_triangulation_2` privately inherits from the class
|
||||
`Delaunay_triangulation_2`. So, users are encouraged to look at the chapter
|
||||
`Delaunay_triangulation_2`. So, users are encouraged to look at Chapter
|
||||
\ref Chapter_2D_Triangulations "2D Triangulation" of the CGAL manual to
|
||||
know more in particular about the representation of triangulations in
|
||||
CGAL and the flexibility of the design.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue