mirror of https://github.com/CGAL/cgal
Explaining the performance test better.
This commit is contained in:
parent
35a12e6101
commit
69a3d922c0
|
|
@ -387,10 +387,19 @@ In 2009, Nico Kruithof started implementation of the
|
|||
\section P2T2_Performance Performance
|
||||
|
||||
The performance of the 2D periodic Delaunay triangulation is compared
|
||||
to the Euclidean 2D Delaunay triangulation. The plot shows the running
|
||||
time in seconds for different numbers of batch inserted points. The
|
||||
points are uniformly randomly distributed in the unit rectangle. The
|
||||
tests were done on an Intel i7 @ 2.67GHz.
|
||||
to the Euclidean 2D Delaunay triangulation. The points are inserted in
|
||||
the Euclidean 2D Delaunay triangulation using spatial sorting. In the
|
||||
Periodic triangulation the points are first inserted in random order
|
||||
until the triangulation is valid in the 1 sheeted covering space. The
|
||||
remaining points are then inserted using spatial sorting. For the
|
||||
large point set, first dummy points are inserted to create a valid
|
||||
triangulation in the 1 sheeted covering space. Then all points are
|
||||
inserted using spatial sorting. As a final step, the dummy points are
|
||||
removed again.
|
||||
|
||||
The plot shows the running time in seconds for different numbers of
|
||||
batch inserted points. The points are uniformly randomly distributed
|
||||
in the unit rectangle. The tests were done on an Intel i7 @ 2.67GHz.
|
||||
|
||||
\image html p2dt2_performance.png
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue