mirror of https://github.com/CGAL/cgal
same kind as previous commit
This commit is contained in:
parent
57958f4e66
commit
c80b9c1fc8
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Questions and Remarks}
|
\section{Questions and Remarks}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\section{Notes}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item CA\_2 and CPA\_2 require squarefree and coprime input!
|
||||||
|
\item Events at infinity are only important for a single curve. Since
|
||||||
|
inf doesn't play a role in CPA\_2 we discuss it for the sake of
|
||||||
|
simplicity as a special case in CA\_2 only.
|
||||||
|
\item AlgebraicReal\_1 - refine: with relative precision is enough. \\
|
||||||
|
Moreover, you can use 'refine() until' for absolute prec.
|
||||||
|
\item SquareFreeFactorization is not returning an additional constant
|
||||||
|
factor. This prevents us from providing an extra interface for
|
||||||
|
algebraic coefficients.
|
||||||
|
\item Is Derivative and XCriticalPoints/YCriticalPoints are not
|
||||||
|
redundant. We decided to keep them both because it is possible that
|
||||||
|
XCriticalPoints/YCriticalPoints use a different methodology, other
|
||||||
|
than residing to the Derivative functor. As Michael pointed out:
|
||||||
|
\emph{``I think we should keep it, since it is more abstract than
|
||||||
|
$solve(derivative(p),p)$. This would again move the {\em
|
||||||
|
AlgebraicKernel} towards a more abstract layer.''}
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Questions}
|
\section{Questions}
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item problem is due to \ccc{AK_1}$<double>$.\\
|
\item problem is due to \ccc{AK_1}$<double>$.\\
|
||||||
|
|
@ -40,22 +60,3 @@
|
||||||
this traits class concept a refinement of RealEmbeddableTraits.
|
this traits class concept a refinement of RealEmbeddableTraits.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Notes}
|
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
|
||||||
\item CA\_2 and CPA\_2 require squarefree and coprime input!
|
|
||||||
\item Events at infinity are only important for a single curve. Since
|
|
||||||
inf doesn't play a role in CPA\_2 we discuss it for the sake of
|
|
||||||
simplicity as a special case in CA\_2 only.
|
|
||||||
\item AlgebraicReal\_1 - refine: with relative precision is enough. \\
|
|
||||||
Moreover, you can use 'refine() until' for absolute prec.
|
|
||||||
\item SquareFreeFactorization is not returning an additional constant
|
|
||||||
factor. This prevents us from providing an extra interface for
|
|
||||||
algebraic coefficients.
|
|
||||||
\item Is Derivative and XCriticalPoints/YCriticalPoints are not
|
|
||||||
redundant. We decided to keep them both because it is possible that
|
|
||||||
XCriticalPoints/YCriticalPoints use a different methodology, other
|
|
||||||
than residing to the Derivative functor. As Michael pointed out:
|
|
||||||
\emph{``I think we should keep it, since it is more abstract than
|
|
||||||
$solve(derivative(p),p)$. This would again move the {\em
|
|
||||||
AlgebraicKernel} towards a more abstract layer.''}
|
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue