songsenand
/
cgal
mirror of https://github.com/CGAL/cgal
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix typos

This commit is contained in:
Andreas Fabri 2019-05-26 11:54:11 +02:00
parent 5c2df203b4
commit d4584ba983
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Segment_Delaunay_graph_2/doc/Segment_Delaunay_graph_2/CGAL/Segment_Delaunay_graph_filtered_traits_2.h
View File

@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ whereas the second requires the exact evaluation of signs of ring-type
expressions, i.e., expressions involving only additions, subtractions
and multiplications. Finally, in order to get exact constructions
`CM` must be set to `Field_with_sqrt_tag` and the number type
in `CK` must support operations involing divisions and square
in `CK` must support operations involving divisions and square
roots (as well as the other three basic operations of course).
The way the predicates are evaluated is discussed in
\cgalCite{b-ecvdl-96} and \cgalCite{cgal:k-reisv-04} (the geometric filtering

4
Segment_Delaunay_graph_2/doc/Segment_Delaunay_graph_2/Segment_Delaunay_graph_2.txt
View File

@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ segment Delaunay graphs:
<LI>The user can define his/her kernel using as number type, a
number type of the form `Filtered_exact<CT,ET>`. Then this
kernel can be entered as the first template parameter in the
`Segment_Delaunay_graph_2<K,MTag>`.
`Segment_Delaunay_graph_traits_2<K,MTag>`.
<LI>The user can define up to three different kernels `CK`,
`FK` and `EK` (default values are provided for most
parameters). The first kernel `CK` is used only for
@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ values of the template parameters, the second method for arithmetic
filtering is more efficient among the two.
Let's consider once more the class
`Segment_Delaunay_graph_2<K,MTag>`.
`Segment_Delaunay_graph_traits_2<K,MTag>`.
The template parameter `MTag` provides another degree of freedom
to the user, who can indicate the type of arithmetic operations to
be used in the evaluation of the predicates. More specifically,