mirror of https://github.com/CGAL/cgal
Removed \input{kdtree}
This commit is contained in:
parent
1fd9fefd1c
commit
e5b4441cd5
|
|
@ -9,21 +9,22 @@
|
|||
|
||||
%\ccChapterSubTitle{\rangetreeRevision, \rangetreeDate}
|
||||
|
||||
\minitoc
|
||||
%\minitoc
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter presents the {\cgal} range tree, segment tree, and $Kd$-tree
|
||||
This chapter presents the {\cgal} range tree and segment tree
|
||||
data structures.
|
||||
The range tree is theoretically superior to the $Kd$-tree, but the
|
||||
latter often seems to perform better.
|
||||
However, the range tree as implemented in {\cgal} is more flexible than the
|
||||
$Kd$-tree implementation, in that it enables to layer together range trees
|
||||
and segment trees in the same data structure.
|
||||
|
||||
% The range tree is theoretically superior to the $Kd$-tree, but the
|
||||
% latter often seems to perform better.
|
||||
% However, the range tree as implemented in {\cgal} is more flexible than the
|
||||
% $Kd$-tree implementation, in that it enables to layer together range trees
|
||||
% and segment trees in the same data structure.
|
||||
|
||||
\input{defs}
|
||||
\input{software_design}
|
||||
\input{range_tree}
|
||||
\input{segment_tree}
|
||||
\input{kd-tree}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,21 +9,22 @@
|
|||
|
||||
%\ccChapterSubTitle{\rangetreeRevision, \rangetreeDate}
|
||||
|
||||
\minitoc
|
||||
%\minitoc
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter presents the {\cgal} range tree, segment tree, and $Kd$-tree
|
||||
This chapter presents the {\cgal} range tree and segment tree
|
||||
data structures.
|
||||
The range tree is theoretically superior to the $Kd$-tree, but the
|
||||
latter often seems to perform better.
|
||||
However, the range tree as implemented in {\cgal} is more flexible than the
|
||||
$Kd$-tree implementation, in that it enables to layer together range trees
|
||||
and segment trees in the same data structure.
|
||||
|
||||
% The range tree is theoretically superior to the $Kd$-tree, but the
|
||||
% latter often seems to perform better.
|
||||
% However, the range tree as implemented in {\cgal} is more flexible than the
|
||||
% $Kd$-tree implementation, in that it enables to layer together range trees
|
||||
% and segment trees in the same data structure.
|
||||
|
||||
\input{defs}
|
||||
\input{software_design}
|
||||
\input{range_tree}
|
||||
\input{segment_tree}
|
||||
\input{kd-tree}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue