songsenand
/
cgal
mirror of https://github.com/CGAL/cgal
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update TODO

This commit is contained in:
Samuel Hornus 2011-06-22 12:56:49 +00:00
parent f76a46bf4a
commit f9d3a0cee8
1 changed files with 6 additions and 33 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

39
Triangulation/TODO
View File

@ -4,41 +4,11 @@ __________________________________________________________________________RENAMI
*) doc :
--------
Pure_complex Triangulation
Delaunay_complex Delaunay_triangulation
PureComplexDSSimplex TriangulationDSFullCell
PureComplexDataStructure TriangulationDataStructure
PureComplexFace TriangulationFace
PureComplexSimplex TriangulationFullCell
PureComplexTraits TriangulationTraits
PureComplexVertex TriangulationVertex
Pure_complex Triangulation
Pure_complex_data_structure Triangulation_data_structure
Pure_complex_ds_simplex Triangulation_ds_full_cell
Pure_complex_ds_vertex Triangulation_ds_vertex
Pure_complex_face Triangulation_face
Pure_complex_locate_type Triangulation_locate_type
Pure_complex_simplex Triangulation_full_cell
Pure_complex_vertex Triangulation_vertex
RegularComplexTraits RegularTriangulationTraits
Regular_complex Regular_triangulation
*) code not done :
------------------
/IN_SIMPLEX/IN_FULL_CELL
/is_finite/! is_infinite/
bring part of Delaunay::remove into TDS (see comments in Delaunay_triangulation.h, and item FUTURE below)
*) to do ?
------------------------
[DONE] /gather_adjacent_simplices/star/ or /compute_star/star/
[DONE] /gather_incident_faces/incident_faces/
[DONE] /gather_incident_upper_faces/incident_upper_faces/
__________________________________________________________________________ALL
*) FUTURE: better system for simplex's flags to know if we can use them or not
@ -47,7 +17,6 @@ __________________________________________________________________________ALL
_________________________________________________TRIANGULATION_DATA_STRUCTURE
*) TriangulationDataStructure:
- Virer insert_in_tagged_hole de la doc TriangulationDataStructure
- Should we put >> and << in the documentation of the class
Triangulation_data_structure ?
@ -60,12 +29,13 @@ _________________________________________________TRIANGULATION_DATA_STRUCTURE
Triangulation_ds_vertex instead of in that of the concept ?
*) TDSFullCellStoragePolicy
what is it ?
it is undocumented.
what is it ? => see the doc.
it is undocumented. => it is documented (Triangulation_ds_full_cell)
if the aim is to choose between "full representation" and "1-skeleton"
I would prefer a different TDS class, at least the doc has to rewriten a sentence
like "class TDS explicitely stores its vertices and full cells"
does not apply to 1-skeleton representation
=> no, this has nothing to do with 1-skeleton.
*) default dim parameter in constructor (especially in the static case)
@ -74,6 +44,9 @@ ________________________________________________________________TRIANGULATION
*) default dim parameter in constructor (especially in the static case)
*) Why vertex at infinity should have index 0 in all cells it appears ?
This is a convention that is enforced throughout the code. Makes it faster
to check for an infinite cell.
The "old" package "Convex_hull_d" does the same.
_______________________________________________________DELAUNAY_TRIANGULATION