mirror of https://github.com/CGAL/cgal
62 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
62 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
- recuperer le dernier objet insere dans geomview
|
|
- pouvoir detruire des objets
|
|
- avoir une option pour que les segments soient des petits cylindres,
|
|
pour qu'on puisse enfin faire des demos 3D...
|
|
- INPUT BUG : not really fixed : if it takes long to run geomview (eg the
|
|
first time you run the program), then the bug is still there.
|
|
Try to fix it properly with select().
|
|
It's still probably a bug in Geomview.
|
|
- The remote geomview (with rsh) facility probably doesn't work.
|
|
But is it useful ?
|
|
- Missing operators (for 2d and 3d Voronoi diagrams) :
|
|
- Ray_[23], Line_[23] : an easy one is already there, but to do it
|
|
perfectly, we should draw the segment resulting from the intersection of
|
|
the object with the BBox.
|
|
- Circle_2
|
|
- Discretisation for Sphere and Circle should be configurable for the stream.
|
|
- Is there a way to see edges like cylinders somewhat (possibly generate them
|
|
ourselves), so that we know which one is in front of which other one ?
|
|
- For T3D : I want to be able to tell Geomview or the CGAL program to stop
|
|
displaying a tetrahedron that I select, so that I can see the inside.
|
|
Maybe it's not really worth it, finally. See the real needs first.
|
|
- I also want to display only the convex hull of a T3D.
|
|
- See how we can use this as a debugger : ask Frederic details on his stuff.
|
|
The fact we're multiprocess probably means we'll even have less problems
|
|
than multi-threads...
|
|
- Should wired_flag be checked for Triangle_[23] and other kernel stuff ?
|
|
|
|
Color:
|
|
------
|
|
- Color is not passed correctly to triangulations, and probably other kernel
|
|
objects. That must be checked, along with transparency.
|
|
- See how we can mix the Color output with the raw mode.
|
|
Currently it's not clear to me.
|
|
Check how to do transparency with Geomview ?
|
|
(passing the one from CGAL::Color)
|
|
|
|
Demo :
|
|
------
|
|
- Add demo files for polyhedrons ?
|
|
|
|
Doc:
|
|
---
|
|
- Monique's comment :
|
|
> > Also note that terrains are supported directly.
|
|
>
|
|
> Je comprends mal cette remarque:
|
|
> Soit c'est trop court et il faut expliquer que tout ca c'est template et que
|
|
> la sortie en tient compte et que donc ca marche bien, et pas que pour les
|
|
> terrains, les terrains ne sont qu'un exemple (important il est vrai, mais
|
|
> bon) de ce qu'on peut faire comme Triangulation_2 un peu speciale, quand il
|
|
> y aura des triangulations de surfaces ca marchera pareil.
|
|
> Soit c'est trop long, si tout ca est bien evident autant ne pas le dire.
|
|
> qu'en penses-tu ?
|
|
|
|
Medite bien, tu me raconteras.
|
|
|
|
Ce qu'il faudrait dire qq part c'est que ces sorties en marcheront que si
|
|
l'utilisateur a defini des sorties geomview pour les points, les segments,
|
|
les triangles et le tetraedres qu'il fournit dans la Traits.
|
|
C'est peut-etre dans la doc de Triangulation_2,3 qu'il faut l'ecrire ?
|
|
pourquoi ne pas l'ecrire aussi dans la doc geomview ?
|